Conformance Evaluation

• Identifies where unsafe or unauthorized decisions are currently possible in your system — even if they haven’t happened yet.
• Pinpoints drift risks across identity, memory, orchestration, and tool invocation.
• Clarifies which decisions must never be allowed to occur — and why governance alone cannot prevent them.
• Reframes your architecture around invariants, conformance boundaries, and admissibility before execution.
• Produces a concrete correction plan you can actually act on, not a conceptual diagram you’ll ignore.

• Founders or executives responsible for AI systems that make or influence real decisions.
• Teams who already feel something is “off” — but can’t yet prove whether the failure is architectural or operational.
• Organizations where explainability, audits, or dashboards are being used as substitutes for structural safety.
• Builders who want systems that remain valid under pressure — not ones that merely behave well in demos.

• If you want dashboards, metrics, or compliance theater — this is not for you.
• If your system assumes internal trust and plans to “fix issues later” — don’t book.
• If you’re looking for prompt tweaks, tooling stacks, or no-code automations — this will feel uncomfortable.
• If you’re not prepared to remove capabilities from your system rather than explain them after the fact — pass.

1. We start with a Fit Call to determine whether this work is appropriate for your system and risk profile.
2. You provide a short pre-brief — diagrams, links, or a plain description of where decisions currently occur.
3. We run a 60–75 minute working session focused on identifying inadmissible states and structural drift.
4. You receive a written summary outlining failure points, invariant violations, and recommended corrections.
5. If further design or oversight makes sense, that conversation happens after real work has been done — not before.

Flat fee for the working session: $2,000. Available only after a successful Fit Call.