Expert Witness & Technical Testimony
Independent analysis of AI systems, authority boundaries, drift, provenance, and accountability — designed to be understandable to non-technical audiences without losing technical rigor.
What I Provide
- • Architecture-level analysis (not “prompt opinions”)
- • Authority / decision-layer separation assessment
- • Drift and coherence failure modes over time
- • Provenance / replay / auditability review
- • Clear written reports + testimony support
Common Use Cases
- • Disputes involving automated decision systems
- • Safety / compliance failures tied to model behavior
- • “Why did the system do that?” incident reconstruction
- • Vendor claims vs real architecture (due diligence disputes)
- • Governance gaps: who approved authority, what controls existed, what was missing
How Engagement Works
We start with a structured Fit Call to confirm scope, materials, and whether I’m a fit for the matter. From there: document review, system mapping, findings, and deliverables.
- • Fit Call → confirm scope + constraints
- • Materials review → architecture + authority mapping
- • Findings → clear, defensible explanation of failure modes
- • Deliverables → written report + testimony support (as applicable)